Global Citizenship Is Good For Business
Submitted by admin on Wed, 01/09/2008 - 1:49pm.
Recently, I enjoyed speaking to the Oregon Forum, a group of local entrepreneurs interested in social change. They
asked me to reflect on global citizenship.
I considered several questions: What is global citizenship?
How do we teach it in schools? How could businesses that
must have employees with global understanding partner
with us to ensure that students graduate from secondary
schools and colleges with these competencies?
In order to move forward we must redefine citizenship
beyond our own borders; adopt positive dispositions toward
cultural differences; speak, understand, and think in lan-
guages other than our native tongues; gain deep knowledge
of world history and geography; grasp the global implica-
tions of health care, climate change, and economic policies;
and understand the process of globalization itself.
How are we doing nationally? Things are changing slowly,
but as a nation we fail to foster global citizens. A thorough
study from the Committee for Economic Development on
Global Leadership cites alarming gaps in children’s learn-
ing. The No Child Left Behind Act, adopted in 2002, holds
states accountable for student achievement in reading,
science, and math. Unfortunately, as schools devote more
time to these subjects we see a reduction in foreign lan-
guage classes and social studies classes where global issues
are explored. Only one-third of 7th to 12th grade students,
and fewer than one in ten college students, study a foreign
language. Seventy percent of students in secondary schools
who are enrolled in a language class study Spanish, and
only a small percentage go beyond two years of study. Few
students in high school or college gain proficiency in any
second language, and very few students learn the languag-
es that the State Department believes crucial to national
security—Arabic, Chinese, Hindi, Japanese, Korean, Farsi,
Russian, and Turkish.
State high school graduation requirements call for minimal
coursework, if any, in international studies, world history,
geography, political science, or area studies. Only one
percent of college undergraduates study abroad. Teacher
education programs provide few classes in teaching global
topics. The media’s coverage of international affairs,
trends, and issues is minimal. During her trial, over fifty
minutes daily was devoted to Martha Stewart on most net-
works, and less than three minutes to the conflict in Darfur.
We ought to worry about where students gain information
about their world.
From a business and economic perspective, the challenges
to our economy are enormous. The international work-
force needs language competencies beyond English be-
cause most United States growth potential lies in overseas
markets. In 2004, 58 percent of our growth earnings were
from overseas. For example, 70 percent of Coca Cola’s
profits are generated outside the United States. Studying
languages and acquiring cultural competency are clearly
economic necessities if Americans hope to compete on the
international stage. A European business executive speaks
an average of 3.9 languages, and an American executive
speaks an average of only 1.5. Business decisions are made
quickly, and the number of people involved in making wise
business decisions must include teams of people who are
multinational and multilingual.
American businesses lose an average of $2 billion per year
because their employees are provided with inadequate
cross-cultural guidance. For example, Microsoft Windows
95 displayed Kashmir outside the boundaries of India.
Microsoft had to recall 200,000 copies of the product. In a
software package marketed in Turkey, Kurdistan is listed
as a Turkish state, although it is a crime to even talk about
Kurdistan in Turkey. An American-made video game
marketed to Saudis included violent scenes accompanied
by chanting from the Koran. Business loss is a direct result
of these cultural gaffes. Moreover, America’s reputation is
damaged when we are perceived as negligent and indiffer-
ent to other cultures.
The Rand Corporation surveyed 16 global corporations,
which rated job applicants from American universities as
the graduates with the least developed international skills.
An executive from a top global corporation told Rand that
American graduates are, “Strong technically, but short-
changed in cross-cultural experience and linguistically
deprived. If I wanted to recruit people who are both techni-
cally skilled and culturally aware, I would not waste time
looking for them on U.S. college campuses.”
The statistics about our students’ and work force’s global
citizenship are discouraging, but there are many things
schools and businesses can do to improve the situation by
working together. Here are several suggestions:
- Harness the expertise of bilingual and non-English speaking employees currently in our work force. Non-English speakers and multinational people hold 48 percent of both management and professional service jobs in the United States. Let’s learn from their experience about how to become competent in other cultures.
- Business leaders need to pressure school boards to include international content at all levels of curriculum. The No Child Left Behind requirements can be addressed by incorporating cultural topics into reading programs.
- Press colleges and universities to form partner- ships with elementary and secondary schools to provide teacher professional development in global education. Colleges and universities could tap their international students and professors to work in elementary and secondary schools.
- Business leaders should insist that teacher educa- tion programs, as well as college programs, have strong international components.
- Corporations should play an active role in support- ing educational initiatives that will produce gradu- ates with cross-cultural competencies.
- Expand the training pipeline at every level to increase the number of Americans fluent in foreign languages, especially Arabic and Chinese.


